Export, import, append

The module where you declare certain providers is called the host module for those providers. And when you use those providers in an external module, that external module is called the consumer module of those providers.

In order for a consumer module to use providers from a host module, the corresponding provider tokens must first be exported from the host module. This is done in the metadata that is passed to the featureModule or rootModule decorator:

import { featureModule } from '@ditsmod/core';

import { FirstService } from './first.service.js';
import { SecondService } from './second.service.js';
import { ThirdService } from './third.service.js';

@featureModule({
  providersPerMod: [FirstService, { token: SecondService, useClass: ThirdService }],
  exports: [SecondService],
})
export class SomeModule {}

Taking into account the exported tokens, Ditsmod will export the corresponding providers from the arrays:

• providersPerMod;
• providersPerRou;
• providersPerReq.

It makes no sense to export the providers that are passed to providersPerApp, since this array will be used to form the injector at the application level. That is, the providers from the providersPerApp array will be available for any module, at any level, and without exporting.

Since you only need to export provider tokens from the host module, not the providers themselves, you cannot directly pass providers in the form of an object to the exports property.

Keep in mind that you only need to export providers from the host module that will be directly used in the consumer modules. In the example above, SecondService can depend on FirstService, but FirstService does not need to be exported if it is not directly used in the consumer module. This ensures module encapsulation.

Exporting controllers does not make sense, since exporting only applies to providers.

Exporting providers from a featureModule

By exporting tokens from a host module in the featureModule decorator metadata, you are declaring that the corresponding providers can be used in consumer modules if they import this host module.

Exporting providers from rootModule

Exporting providers from the root module means that these providers will automatically be added to every module in the application:

import { rootModule } from '@ditsmod/core';

import { SomeService } from './some.service.js';
import { OtherModule } from './other.module.js';

@rootModule({
  imports: [OtherModule],
  providersPerRou: [SomeService],
  exports: [SomeService, OtherModule],
})
export class AppModule {}

In this case, SomeService will be added to all application modules at the route level. As you can see, you can also export entire modules. In this case, all providers exported from OtherModule will also be added to each application module.

Import module

You cannot import a single provider into a module, but you can import an entire module with all the providers and extensions exported from it:

import { featureModule } from '@ditsmod/core';
import { FirstModule } from './first.module.js';

@featureModule({
  imports: [
    FirstModule
  ]
})
export class SecondModule {}

For example, if SomeService is exported from the FirstModule, then this service can now be used in the SecondModule. However, if FirstModule has controllers, they will be ignored in this import form. For Ditsmod to take into account controllers from an imported module, the module must be imported with a prefix passed in path:

// ...
@featureModule({
  imports: [
    { path: '', module: FirstModule }
  ]
})
export class SecondModule {}

Although path is an empty string here, for Ditsmod, the presence of path means:

1. to consider controllers from the imported module as well;
2. to use path as a prefix for all controllers imported from FirstModule.

As you can see, in the previous example, this time neither the provider nor the module is imported, but the object. This object has the following interface:

interface ModuleWithParams<M extends AnyObj = AnyObj, E extends AnyObj = AnyObj> {
  id?: string;
  module: ModuleType<M>;
  path?: string;
  guards?: GuardItem[];
  /**
   * List of modules, `ModuleWithParams` or tokens of providers exported by this
   * module.
   */
  exports?: any[];
  providersPerApp?: Provider[];
  providersPerMod?: Provider[];
  providersPerRou?: Provider[];
  providersPerReq?: Provider[];
  /**
   * This property allows you to pass any information to extensions.
   *
   * You must follow this rule: data for one extension - one key in `extensionsMeta` object.
   */
  extensionsMeta?: E;
}

Note that only the module property is required in this interface.

To reduce the length of the code when importing an object of this type, it is sometimes advisable to write a static method in the importing module. To see this clearly, let's take the previous example again:

// ...
@featureModule({
  imports: [
    { path: '', module: FirstModule }
  ]
})
export class SecondModule {}

If you wrote FirstModule and knew that this module would make sense to be imported many times into different modules with different prefixes, then in this case you could write a static method in this class that returns an object specially designed for import:

// ...
export class FirstModule {
  static withPrefix(path: string) {
    return {
      module: this,
      path
    }
  }
}

Now the object returned by this method can be imported as follows:

// ...
@featureModule({
  imports: [
    FirstModule.withPrefix('some-prefix')
  ]
})
export class SecondModule {}

In this case, the reduction of the code almost did not occur compared to the previous example, when we imported the object directly, and the readability also worsened. So when you write static methods for import, consider whether they simplify the code.

In order for TypeScript to control exactly what the static import method returns, it is recommended to use the ModuleWithParams interface:

import { ModuleWithParams } from '@ditsmod/core';
// ...
export class SomeModule {
  static withParams(someParams: SomeParams): ModuleWithParams<SomeModule> {
    return {
      module: this,
      // ...
    }
  }
}

Import classes or class instances?

Let's consider a specific situation. In the following example, each provider is a class. Note what arrays these providers are passed to and what exactly is exported.

// ...
@featureModule({
  providersPerMod: [Provider1],
  providersPerRou: [Provider2],
  providersPerReq: [Provider3],
  exports: [Provider1, Provider2, Provider3],
})
export class Module1 {}

Suppose we import this module into Module2, which has no providers of its own:

// ...
@featureModule({
  imports: [Module1]
  // ...
})
export class Module2 {}

As a result of this import, Module2 will now have three providers at the same levels as declared in Module1. When working with these providers, their instances are created separately in both modules. A singleton can only be shared between modules if its provider is declared at the application level. In our example, providers are declared at the module, route, and request levels, so Module1 and Module2 will not share class instances at any level.

So it can be argued that classes are imported, not their instances.

Import and encapsulation

Let's consider a situation where only Provider3 is exported from Module1, since only this provider is directly used in external modules:

// ...
@featureModule({
  providersPerMod: [Provider1],
  providersPerRou: [Provider2],
  providersPerReq: [Provider3],
  exports: [Provider3],
})
export class Module1 {}

Suppose Provider3 has a dependency on Provider1 and Provider2. What will Ditsmod do when importing this module into other modules? Ditsmod will import all three providers, since Provider3 depends on the other two providers.

Appending of the module

If you don't need to import providers and extensions into the current module, but just append the external module to the path prefix of the current module, you can use the appends array:

import { featureModule } from '@ditsmod/core';
import { FirstModule } from './first.module.js';

@featureModule({
  appends: [FirstModule]
})
export class SecondModule {}

In this case, if SecondModule has a path prefix, it will be used as a prefix for all routes contained in FirstModule. Only those modules with controllers can be appended.

You can also attach an additional path prefix to FirstModule:

// ...
@featureModule({
  appends: [{ path: 'some-path', module: FirstModule }]
})
export class SecondModule {}

In this example, an object was used, in which the module is passed for appending, it has the following interface:

interface AppendsWithParams<T extends AnyObj = AnyObj> {
  id?: string;
  path: string;
  module: ModuleType<T>;
  guards?: GuardItem[];
}

Re-export of the module

In addition to importing a specific module, the same module can be simultaneously exported:

import { featureModule } from '@ditsmod/core';
import { FirstModule } from './first.module.js';

@featureModule({
  imports: [FirstModule],
  exports: [FirstModule],
})
export class SecondModule {}

What is the meaning of this? - Now if you import SecondModule into some other module, you will actually have FirstModule imported as well.

Pay attention! If during re-export you import an object with ModuleWithParams interface, the same object must also be exported:

import { featureModule, ModuleWithParams } from '@ditsmod/core';
import { FirstModule } from './first.module.js';

const firstModuleWithParams: ModuleWithParams = { path: 'some-path', module: FirstModule };

@featureModule({
  imports: [firstModuleWithParams],
  exports: [firstModuleWithParams],
})
export class SecondModule {}